Forums

There is a second series.

Watched the first series and loved it, but yes, given recent events it does tarnish it considerably.

I think if it was just a matter of paying the 400k fee that Rangers paid Dundee recently Cameron would be a certain signing this summer. I think he’s young enough and experienced enough at the same time to fit the profile of player the board seems to like. The problem I see is that surely his wages at Rangers will dwarf what we can offer and I could see that becoming a real stumbling block.

Nah. I'm correct but it's not worth arguing over. No prizes to be won. Bottom line is we'll win on Saturday and abody will be happy. Presumably. Maybe. Hopefully.

Yeah, true .... but it's not the same. In Russian roulette, each misfire does shorten the odds. But, let's say after each misfire, the next 'participant' is allowed to spin the revolving cylinder thingy ... then the odds are the same each time - unaffected by the previous misfire. Then there is the assumed certainty that there is one bullet in the gun. What if there's not? So, if the Dons were somehow guaranteed one goal every six games .... whether by 'the gods', corrupt refs, opponents betting on their own team, or by some scammy fortune teller who is 'never wrong', ... then yeah .... each goalless game would increase the odds of a goal in the next. But guaranteed a goal every x number of games we are not. Of course we will score eventually .... but the odds that it will be any particular game, whether the next, the one after, or the one after that, is not governed by previous outcomes. On the contrary, if we had been scoring freely in previous games, Ah'd say the probability/expectation o' scorin' in the next game would be much higher than that which our current form would indicate.