http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-14489401
Aberdeen bypass: Judge rules against legal challenge
A judge has ruled against campaigners who are trying to block the building of a bypass around Aberdeen.
They argued that a public inquiry into the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (APWR) had been flawed.
Lord Tyre rejected the appeal on the grounds there had been sufficient opportunities before the hearing for public representations to be made.
The £400m project had been delayed by the court proceedings at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
Lord Tyre ruled against two appeals heard together;
one brought by William Walton on behalf of anti Aberdeen bypass group, Roadsense
the other from John Weir Fraser and Mrs Maggie Fraser
Both appeals argued that the procedure had been unfair because the inquiry held in 2008 was given an unreasonably restricted remit.
There were also two separate challenges, based upon obligations of Scottish ministers under the Habitats Directive.
One related to the impact of the scheme on the River Dee Special Area of Conservation (SAC), the other to the disturbance of European protected species (otters and five species of bat).
Again the court rejected these arguments and found that Scottish ministers did sufficiently address all of the relevant requirements.
Opponents criticise the cost and environmental impact of the plan, which is aimed at creating a fast link to the north, west and south of Aberdeen.
Infrastructure link
The bypass was originally given the go-ahead by Scottish ministers in December 2009 following a lengthy public inquiry.
Many business leaders in the area support the project.
SNP and Aberdeen Central MSP Kevin Stewart welcomed the ruling saying it was excellent news for Aberdeen and the North East.
He added: "The AWPR is a vital infrastructure link for the North East and for Scotland as a whole.
"Getting the go ahead for this road will boost the economy, cut congestion and improve links across the region.
But anti bypass campaigner, Sheona Warnock, from Roadsense, said: "We are hugely disappointed. It's been a very long and hard fought campaign.
"We thought we made some very good points.
"We will need sometime to consider his judgement.
"We haven't got to the point of considering an appeal."