TENEMENTFUNSTER

Langfield had 2 or 3 alone against St Mirren and several more against United. Whether or not another keeper, mediocre or otherwise, would have made them is pretty irrelevant as we won't know. The fact is Langfield did and it would be difficult to find goals Langfield has been responsible for recently. I'm saying this from the perspective of someone who would be happier with someone else in the long term ie next season starting as No.1. Him and the defence aren't doing at all badly as they are. But when there's mistakes made (and there will be) the "I told you he wis shite" folks are always ready. There have been plenty made right in front of Langfield that have resulted in goals in recent weeks.

Can you imagine Timmy getting anything other than 100% support from a British audience?

One of the "video nasty" generation of movies, a classic!

SS was the place to be at the Smirn cup match. I'd choose the SS.

Supposedly Rae is away to Australia but if he's fit wouldn't be averse to playing on.

I genuinely don't see enough of most other keepers to know if they're much cop or not. We don't lose too many goals of late and the keeper has to play a part in that, in fact, the goals we have lost in the last few games have been largely down to some poor defending. I'm not averse to changing the keeper just I would be less inclined to changing it in January given there being less liklihood for value for money and the fact Langfield has recovered some form and the defence as a unit seems much more solid.

Amen to that!

We can't afford that though Al. We need someone long term though despite Langfield being better than average this season. Can we have a right back?

Surprised at the equaliser, Chelsea are usually good at defending racists.

United dominated in the 2nd half just didn't put their chances away, should have got a least a point.

It was McCausland.

Buchan was a good player himself though Young would have been fine alongside Miller. McLeish was the perfect partner for Miller though.

Robbing this 2 nil.

Na, I'm the jinx. Luckily I'm no there so we have an outside chance.

McGINNIESTA! 7 IN 7!! Getting a bit of a tanking but 2 scud up.

Robertson and Considine getting ripped. Again.

Doesn't seem we're doing that great either way despite being a goal up.

Seems though it's very changeable. In possession it's 3-4-3 then 3-5-2 when defending, playing on the counter.

Miller and Goodwin reckon otherwise. Just what they're saying.

More likely a 352.

GIE IT TAE JONNY!!!!

Miller suggesting that there's 2 marking CH'S and a sweeper at the back. Nearer a 5-3-2. Consi already sounding quite isolated from Clark Robertson who had a bit of a shite game in the cup against them.

Fallon makes the bench, Rae out altogether, Vernon dropped to the bench, Hayes starts.

No really the point though is it? It has to be taken seriously.

That is the one.