rocket_scientist

Candeais again. AOC having a good game... so far.

Fuck sake GMS.

Considine cost us a certain goal. It's just that they're so shit they didn't score. The space he gave Candeias was beyond bizarre. Thank fuck Morelos isn't worth a fraction they paid for him.

This is how I saw tonight: - EVERY great team has a triangle rock at the back. That's what SAF believed anyway i.e. Leighton Miller McLeish, Schmeichel Bruce Pallister. I wanted Lewis Kari and McKenna in there. The spot right of the triangle is Shay. The triangle ahead of him are Stewart, Christie and McGinn. The triangle on the left was Shinnie as an attacking LB with GMS and McLean, the three of them interchanging and covering each other (same as right triangle), Rooney being the spot up top. Edot: Sometimes pics are better than words to describe stuff like this. That's how I saw our set-up tonight anyway, the triangle on the right being more fluid than the one of the left, Shinnie being the back of it but McGinn, GS and Ryan working together to run riot and fluid as hell.

I would've been happy with a few options but not this one. My ideal for this game was; Lewis Logan-Kari-McKenna-Shinnie McGinn-Christie-McLean-GMS Greg Stewart-Rooney

My 4-0 win prediction has just bitten the dust. McKenna is back, as expected but AOC and Considine starting and Kari and McGinn on the bench not what I was hoping for.

Their Guns of Brixton is indeed class. As is this: -

Spot on. I couldn't agree any more or less.

I thought it was interesting. The music was delightful. As was the girl in the video. The man nearest the camera was a borderline rapist. He would give them loads of drink, get them so far and then push hard before consent had really been established. The guy with the horrendous jumper was the opposite and probably a virgin. He didn't know how to express himself and was so meek.

I like the flavour of that post Barcosente. It tastes good. Having digested all your words a couple of times however, I'm struggling to understand what it is I've just eaten. It's not that you used words improperly and without good construction, nor have I (or indeed anyone else) the right to challenge an articulate and original view but I'll ask anyway; Do you have an opinion on whether the proposed new stadium is a good thing or not?

To be fair with 2/3rds of possession and 25 shots, an inevitable result. Exciting seeing the HT score though.

Russia have never exhibited an expansionist agenda. Putin has no interest in provoking conflict with NATO. MAD would indeed be mutually assured destruction but the provocation and actions that create the risk of war is 100% unilateral.

Interesting latest angle by the deep state to stoke up fear and villainise Russia. The demonisation of Putin has been an ongoing orchestrated propaganda campaign by the "elite" who want wars and who need wars to further steal money from the public, cement their own positions and keep us down. But now telling us how advanced and superior their arsenal is? Whilst I can understand how this fits their broad agenda, it's a sinister innovation designed to prepare us for the inevitable world war, one that only the moneyed men in the west want.

Squeaky clean was never a reality and always a lie, an unachievable aspiration that acts as a front for "decency". Yet another tool of their hypocrisy. Farage's leadership proved that the electorate are so shallow, it's about the personality not the policies.

I have no doubt that what you ask is above my understanding. Why would we be judged by what others do or think? This makes no sense to me. Edit: ok I think you're talking about what impact Marney has on beige man (he's so boring I don't even remember his name). Yeah it's nuts to judge him by her actions... on the face of it. It's only when the process of judgement is as crucial as it is for a leader or politician that his judgements about the company he keeps etc. is a valid subject for examination. Edit II: I wasn't thinking about that angle, the impact she has had on him. If any at all, him being the leader of a dead and irrelevant cause. I was only judging her and how her life is being written in her appearance already, aged 25, in her eyes particularly.

Venus and Mars. Veal and Mutton. Viberg and Matalan. Vicks and Moisturiser. Venerable and Maligned. The man who has a daughter is well placed to understand this truth. With three daughters, a wife and a bitch dog, I'm convinced that the female of the species is not knowable by mere men. They're too different to know. Their hormones are erratic and their brains are random. Jo Marney though. She's an archetypal gold digger. She has screws loose up top but she screws loose down below for money. It's one of the more stomach-turning examples in that he is a horribly boring beige man with political ambition that is as dead as the chances of Burnley beating Cowdenbeath 2-1 in the Scottish Cup final in May, whereas she is a horrible soul who might have been a looker had her behaviour, outlook and views not been so vile *. There is a deadness in her eyes. Fucking slut. Edit: someone once said/wrote that a mans life can be seen in his face or a man wears his life in his face, something like that. This is a truth written by a man of instinct and only understood by men of instincts. For men, read women. Interchangeable on many points when discussing the human condition. Marney is ugly. Every photo of her repels a decent spirit. She's a wrong Un. The square or the person suffering instinctius defunctum might counter with but you don't know her. That would be to misinterpret know and to underestimate instinct, particularly instant instinct.

If he picks the right team and doesn't do anything stupid like 3 at the back again, scum 0, AFC 4. Will explain my optimism after the 125/1 correct scoreline comes in. Rooney, Logan, GMS and GMS. In that order.

The success of this appointment will depend on the difference he makes to the bottom line. On the face of it, his background looks great and he should bring good strategic direction. These new faces just remind us how appallingly badly the club has been run for 20 years. Optimistic that this could signal an uplift in business management. Wm. Donald's £10m was the turning point.

7-11 May Ryanair £126 each return.

Less than £90 per head Edinburgh Budapest return 23rd to 26th March was what I was looking at. Much cheaper and more convenient than flying from Abz. Edit: Nah, typical O'Leary dishonesty on the Ryanair App. Would need to use Skyscanner and properly research it.

Al, Ryanair go direct from Edinburgh to Budapest. Download their App. Reasonable prices. Couldn't see any direct from Glasgow on Skyscanner. I would book it online rather than the App though as they changed their cabin baggage policy last week. Pay £6 for priority + 2 bags. I never normally need anything other than my one case that fits in the overhead lockers for short trips. Last week I had the luxury of a small rucksack too. And when flying from Edinburgh, the Royal Scot car parking is superb service.

I checked out the NYP last night after you mentioned and it looks really impressive and not over the top in price. The architecture is stunning and whilst I'm not usually a fan of restaurants who put pictures of their dishes, the New York Cafe does it better than I've ever seen anyone do it. Mouth-watering quality and brilliant design and attention to detail. It was the London "posh" hotels that I meant rather than this one that I've not been to. It looks on booking.com that Budapest is very well served for hotels. Unlike Aberdeen. And Maud.

Past preference. Not worth the money. Greedily milking their histories and reputations.

It is indeed weird, the speculation offered on here. I think McLean going is best for AFC. He's nae my cup of cocoa.

I don't like the blond's dress sense. Would prefer her without clothes on.