rocket_scientist

Staggering result and just what I deserved for choosing a birthday meal over Pittodrie. My son and I could easily have gone to the match and insisted on an earlier eat but we couldn't be arsed going. Well done McInnes and AFC. Emphatic. Fuck you McGhee. You fucking chin. High time someone chinned that arse.

Was that necessary? The edit I mean. Like where else can a man fuck a man?

The key word is if. I don't know if he's a hun. I just heard that he was. But not everything we see and hear is true so time will tell. Danny Boyle and Irvine Welsh and Ewen MacGregor must surely have made it easier for candidates to turn them down.

New fav casual jacket 3 weeks ago - Engineered Garments, New York. Loved it so much, I bought another today, exact same but in a different colour.

Surprised at you and your absolute certainty on this point. It could be your strategy of saying what should be in the hope that what shouldn't be won't come to pass but unlike the feeble minded who always trust authority and the establishment, the happy clappers who watch whilst Rome burns, I expected a wider consideration of the possibilities and probabilities here. I hope you're right but having lived in the weege for a few years myself, never underestimate the overwhelming sickness that these cunts were brought up in.

This concept interests me, the re-watching of a film already seen. One of my daughters is visiting this weekend and is taking her mother to La La Land. She's already seen it and it was hardly months ago when it first came out. She's not a thick cunt, doing a Ph.D. in highly specialised medicine having racked up first class honours and distinctions and stuff. But I think it's fucking stupid to go see a film again. You've seen it already! Why bother going again? My son wanted to join me to see T2, having seen it within 7 days earlier. What's wrong with these cunts, including my own? Understandable if it's Pulp Fiction (or other Tarantino's) or other brilliant films (of which there are very few) but wait a couple of years at least. Kids these days...

Once a Hun, always a Hun.

I did enjoy that 6.05 pm kick off game. I enjoyed the one in 83 better. Josh and Sone. Lahm got free in the second half and ran riot. That night was the last time I ever did something I'll never do again. It was good at the time.

Stonehaven. The other side of the river on the same side of the road as the Carron chipper. Some magic stuff in there, cheap as chips. That piece hasn't got a home in our home yet. Doesn't match our stuff. But not seeking to flog it. We will fit it in one day somehow.

Too much talking is an interesting criticism. Henry Fonda in that jury film, shot in one room was all dialogue and that was an all time classic.

I don't do it at all. The wife does.

That would be lovely. Divine karma. Natural justice. But with so many "customers", it would be almost impossible to fuck it up... by anyone with even a smidgeon of common sense and a tiny fraction of business acumen. Their problem has been greed, self-serving cunts doing deals against the best interests of the club e.g. Ticketmaster, Sports Direct. Normally this type of (very normal) corporate behaviour should be condemned. In their case, I say give them a knighthood. And the day after, abolish the House of Lords.

Chance of some meaty semis. AFC, Hearts and the OF. Big chance of an Aberdeen Celtic final but one game at a time!

Does anyone know who is managing Morton's opponents today? If the manager hasn't resigned, as he reported he hadn't, then he's going to be in the dugout surely? More great comedy ahead hopefully.

I agree. I was pished when I wrote that. Sometimes declaring negative outcomes is a guard against being disappointed if and when they happen. I've criticised McInnes when I feel he's deserved it but compared to every other clown manager in the last 25 years, he's clearly the best we've had. I dreamt we were playing beautiful football consistently and won admiration all over the world. Hayes was very instrumental but there was a John McMaster type, spraying passes all over the shop with a cultured left foot.

McInnes will go to Ibrox. That's as obvious as the fact that he will fail there and get punted within 17 months.

Breadman was always out of his depth at any club attracting crowds of more than 5k. This is his limits being found out. Eventually. Useless uninspiring guffy cunt. Fuck him. And fuck those sick cunts who paid his wages.

It was so stress-free and comfortable the last time we played them, anything other than a win would be unacceptable.

This was on the radio this morning - Hadn't heard it for almost 40 years. Magic band. Jocko Homo unforgettable. Their version of Satisfaction too. In the second half of the 70's the "yoof" got off their arse and didn't accept the established way of things. It wasn't just anarchy in the UK. It spread to a handful in America too. Devo beat that drum hard. Genius individualists.

Exactly what most of us are thinking. I don't care how many years she's been clean. Her habit almost cost her her life previously. It almost certainly contributed to it now. Sad girl. Never found happiness I would guess. A bird trapped in a cage. Her spirit was sound. Her upbringing strangled it.

I find it tragic how so many invest so much time watching a screen. Banksy - one of the greatest humans - is forever tweeting about the need to read.

You make some great points Ox, indisputable ones. I concede these. I still think the dumbed down society is the bigger issue, as I said. Without going into social engineering agendas which may or may not involve agriculture and the food chain, education, the media and the pharmas, it's a sad day when the "vulnerable" amongst us aren't just children these days. Even if the use of big data was regulated, there's no way we can identify adults for being excluded or exempt based on their social awareness or intellectual capacity. Well, we can of course use data to identify precisely this; it's just that we can't regulate to exclude or exempt them. Whilst it was inevitable that big data would be used in targeted marketing, it is indeed scary that yet further lines are being blurred between intelligence (data) gatherers and government but hasn't it always been thus? Isn't this just big business and politicians being in bed together, a highly unethical situation that has been encouraged and fostered over the last few decades, to the point where whistle-blowing is frowned upon, Snowden has to flee for his life, Assange gets effectively imprisoned and we're in a "post-truth" age? Vietnam was about losing Helicopters, Cheney et al were feeding at the hands of the Bush's.. actually, scrap that, Halliburton were dictating US foreign policies, bankers the world over control the markets and the public purse is usurped by the ruling classes.

Why is Bercow attracting criticism for his words yesterday? 1. Racism 2. Sexism 3. Independence of the judiciary It's the speakers prerogative (well, one of three) to invite an address or not so there isn't any possible protocol breach there and what he said was absolutely true. If we can't stand up for "our values", however compromised they have been by Blair and Cameron, we're not a country at all. The speaker did the PM's thinking for her, that's what they don't like but that's hardly his fault, giving the correct view on a subject that he has jurisdiction on and speaking the truth where the cowering old witch wimp hasn't got any balls.

No it doesn't get boring. 4 million further hits since I discovered it less than 12 hours ago. I must admit to a couple of dozen of those but unlike many who did it to amuse themselves, I was doing it purely for scientific purposes only to be disappointed by the limited options provided. A bigger imagination could have come up with many more toots and trumps. Christ there wasn't even anything coming at him from his left side. Lazy cunt animators.

Great find manc. On the ethics, I have no problem with the work of Cambridge Analytica. Specific target marketing isn't new. It's the methods that have changed and why wouldn't they? The bigger issue is the population, too lazy to inform themselves and too thick to understand and who are vulnerable to buying whatever they're told to buy. Very clever stuff on one hand but sinister on another. Have the population been dumbed down deliberately? The evidence would appear to say yes.