Jump to content

Saturday 15th March 2025 - kick-off 3pm

Scottish Premiership: St Johnstone v Aberdeen

Edinburghdon

Members
  • Posts

    3,029
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Edinburghdon

  1. Of course the shite run of form wore thin a long time ago, nobody is denying that but there's not half been a lot of bollocks posted because of a run of poor form. And it's hardly a holier than now attitude, just giving my opinion.
  2. A coach with a decent pedigree and only weeks in the job? Aye screaming out to be put out of his misery
  3. I've always said you knew fuck all Good 3 points, hopefully this is the start of another run as the negative shite from the fan base is starting to wear thin.
  4. http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/1334017-said-and-done-key-points-from-rangers-annual-general-meeting-2015/ Some brilliantly deluded questions and answers in that article... I'm sure The Rangers fans will buy it hook line and sinker though.
  5. Edinburghdon

    Tennis

    He couldn't... ran out of steam after the 2nd set.
  6. Assuming they're actually selling the tops?...
  7. The over all quality in the wales team is far superior to ours. There's no particular embarrassment them qualifying and not us.
  8. I see the point, but at the end of the day failure is failure...
  9. This Armageddon is awful isnt it? Scottish football really is dying. Oh, wait...
  10. Wonderful, I threw the shrapnel in my skybet account on a frankly ridiculous 9 team accumulator. Sporting Lisbon is the only one ruining that coupon, looks like my winning streak is over
  11. I'd argue that there was signs of us being back to our usual standard in spells against Celtic and going on what Mcinnes said it was the same against Motherwell. Here's hoping that continues and we get back on top form starting this weekend.
  12. Aye? Fair enough then. I can't say I noticed!
  13. And how long have the rumours been widespread that Jack was fighting with Logan/McInnes? I can only remember seeing it on here/AFC chat over the last week or two, certainly not a month. I could be wrong though.
  14. Good, I'm glad he's come out and rubbished it, hopefully everyone can move on again and the team can turn things around.
  15. I've no doubt it is a lie considering the players trotting out the statements... but to think the Scottish league should be judged by what some random Dutch bloke thinks is pretty laughable really. I do agree that the image of the game is important too though.
  16. Off on a slight tangent here but it's always bugged me that whenever the same old tired stories are trotted out about Scottish football needing the Old Firm/Rangers dutch footballers make the point that nobody in Holland cares about Scottish football apart from the Old Firm games. Why the hell would that make a difference? Who in Scotland gives a shite about Dutch football?! Why should what Dutch people think of the league have any relevance? I see Drivers point about the standard of stadiums etc helping the image of the game though.
  17. But you'll get all excited about rumours of McInnes shagging his way through the squad? Hun sympathizer
  18. I totally agree that all sponsorship money is split evenly between all parties, there's no reason for it not to be and it means everyone benefits equally from the annual sponsorship. Saying that what's the point in finishing as high up the league as possible if there's nothing to reward that performance? It's nothing to do with perceived entitlement it's just about competition. What's the point in a prize if there's no difference in whether you win or not? It's just backwards. Out of interest can you name one sport that has the same prize for finishing second as it does for winning?... As for your last point, I've no idea what the hell that has to do with it... (also unless I'm very much mistaken an increase in inheritance tax would mean the fat lazy cunt loses out on money doesn't it?)
  19. Wheres the fairness in a team finishing first getting the same prize money as a team finishing in 11th or 12th?
  20. Apologies I've just seen this, I totally agree it was a fantastic delivery but like others have said Miller gave his opinion at the time and I totally agree with it, Taylor should have been attacking that ball. Don't get me wrong it is a very good goal but I do think it was avoidable.
  21. I find it hard to disagree with anything McInnes said there, I thought we were playing fairly well in the first half and had a bit of our early season swagger back, genuinely could have seen us getting something from the game. No doubt about it we should have done better for their first but a player on that sort of form will do that to you if you switch off even a little. Different game after the penalty though, there was no coming back from that.
  22. With the exception of playing Reynolds and Quinn at centre half that's the team I'd play as it stands. Eventually I'd like us to sign another central midfielder to allow McLean to play further up the pitch instead of Goodwillie though.
  23. I've expressed that numerous times before, both on here and in person. I'd hazard a guess that the main reason that particular back 4 hasn't been picked yet is due to the unavailability of Reynolds early in the season. If it isn't picked soon I'd be surprised and disappointed.
  24. Exactly the back line id pick too, couldn't agree more about Taylor as well. He's a danger at attacking set pieces but he's a liability defensively far too often to be part of a first choice centre half partnership.
  25. It's got to be Quinn and Reynolds at the back from now on, no excusing that challenge. Madness
×
×
  • Create New...