RicoS321

Did you see O'Connor the last time he played in midfield? He was woeful. Too slow on the turn, couldn't cope, but did manage the occasional hard challenge which meant some people probably overlooked the fact he was pish.

Aye, eminently sensible, relatively inexpensive, unlikely to go over budget and won't cause significant disruption to the area, whilst retaining the best parts of the park. But junkies, we need shops, car parks min and but £50M min! means that it'll never go ahead.

I blame Eric Bristow.

Think really shite hun striker from about 5-6 years back. Hilariously bad. Probably scored against the dons.

But they're also heteros too, as any bloke that shags a bird is a hetero.

You're a conoisseur, you can surely manage mealy? It's just oatmeal, ingins and suet. Yir bound to get all those in Spain.

Feel free, but at least back it up with evidence. Not saying yer wrang, I'm suggesting you haven't looked. Good chance that they are just deviants who like all sorts, but had easy access to young loons through fitba.

Just found out about this. Bit of a pain in the airse if I'm honest as I canna really be fucked. But I will. Think it'll be the same back four as the weekend, with the only changes being Jack and Stockley out and McGinn and Rooney in ---------------Lewis--------------------- Logan---Taylor---Reynolds---Considine ----------McLean----Shinnie------------ --McGinn-----Maddison--------Hayes-- ----------------Rooney------------------ I'm with Jute though, I'd rather see Storie get his chance, as he should when a midfielder is missing, and play Shinnie at full back and drop Reynolds. I thought Taylor was harshly criticised for the huns first goal, so I'd be inclined to keep him in (just because O'Connor was so fucking bad in the final, he needs an extra week to think about it). We'll need him to go up front for the last 3 minutes anyway when we're 1-0 down. 1-1, Taylor.

Neighbor came round, so missed a large part of the second. At 1-0 we were very much in it and the better team. Looks like we didn't kick on fae there. Oh well, back to the drawing board. Jack with a stupid sending off means he's missing next week, which means Shinnie will definitely be in midfield. Ref looked fucking awful for both sides.

Been an okay game so far. Bit 100 mile an hour like, but pretty even. Need to run at their right back, as he was easily booked early doors and looks pish. Hayes playing almost centrally at times, when he should be roasting the full back. Again our midfield chasing the game a bit at times, but overall not too many problems. Back line doing okay all things considered, although O'Halloran has looked dangerous on a couple of occasions when running at full pelt. Should be an interesting second half, and can't see McInnes making any changes until we lose a goal or go ahead.

I had a feeling he might play Reynolds and Stockley (I mentioned it earlier in the thread). Thought McGinn would be in for Hayes or Maddison though (in deek's line-up, not my preferred), both of whom weren't up to much last week, Hayes especially. Is it on anywhere, or just radio?

Davie Provan was it? I'm not sure I ever liked him.

He did have nice hair...

I have to deal with people I don't like everyday in my work. I do it professionally and give them respect and as much as leeway as is needed for them to do their job because ultimately it's how my business makes money. If Mezz is a dick, then they can take the higher ground and pander to his dickishness, which would be relatively harmless no matter the scale of said dickishness. It's about understanding when to let things go, and in the field of display-setting-up, there is very little that shouldn't be let go - unless you're an uber-cunt who wants to wank over your own perceived relevance and authority. Just let Mezz get on with it and be the better person/club and help him because whatever you think of displays in general (I couldn't really give a fuck) they are pretty impressive and well organised. I suspect young kids seeing them think it's pretty cool too and good to be a part of, as do the club who use them on all their marketing about being "part of the dons family" and all that wanker shite.

Fit?

It's the done thing these days, I find it all rather boring. No one says anything about anyone that might rock the boat for fear of the "pinning on the dressing room wall" cliche pish. Given our national press only deals in hysterics these days, people are confined to saying zero in their interviews for fear of completely distracting everyone in the build up to their games.

Daily mail? Without even so much as an apology? I'll probably get aids if I follow the link, so I'm nae going to. Charlie Nicholas is a cock also (although a hero when he was a dandy).

That's a fan assisted grill. Use that. It's better. More akin to a yank broil ina. The grill is indeed a BBQ expression in the states. "Le Grill, what the hell is le grill?" as Homer Simpson once said trying to build a BBQ with French instructions. Edit: Keep and eye on it fan yer using the fan assisted grill, they can be whooring quick to burn the shite out of stuff.

Wouldn't give the huns my money, so definitely not going. Think we are capable of tanking them, but it's all up to Deek. I'm going 1-3 for the dons. Taylor, Rooney 2 I think I'd drop O'Connor for Taylor for this one. Whilst it wasn't his fault he was played at left centre half, he was still pish and I think it'd be unfair to drop Taylor. ------------------Lewis-------------------- Logan----Taylor----Considine----Shinnie ------------McLean----Jack--------------- --McGinn--------Maddison-------Hayes-- ----------------Rooney-------------------- Derek's 11: ------------------Lewis-------------------- Logan----Taylor----Reynolds---Considine ---------McLean----Jack----Shinnie------ --McGinn------------------------Rooney-- ----------------Stockley-------------------

Aye, it's grilling for yanks.

St Andrew's day is lame as fuck though. I'm glad we don't celebrate it like thon Irish dicks and their St Paddys fuckwittery. Who the fuck is St Andrew anyway? One of Jesus' mates nae doubt. Probably a total dick. Aye, jesus.

Aye, those were indeed the series of events. I was hoping for a little more detail....

It's probably a big SFA-conspired front to put Hertz off in tonight's game v the hun. It'll all be off tomorrow.

No, I'm saying that in order to come up with a figure of 12.5K, then a design (not necessarily detailed, but a representation) of a redeveloped pittodrie must already exist. I'm just asking to be shown it (i.e. the evidence). Does that seem unreasonable to you? I think you have an understanding in this area (planning/building design), so do you think the figure of 12.5K is easy to come by without a suggested design (or even options)? I don't think you can throw a few figures in the air and come up with an accurate number given the sheer number of different stadium types and seating arrangements possible. I also think that the 12.5K is intentionally low so as fans don't think "well I actually wouldn't mind a 16/17(whatever)K seater stadium rather than move to Westhill". It looks to me like a figure chosen for it's absolute certainty of getting no backing, as only an idiot would want a 12.5K seater stadium rather than move. The board are in no way obligated to show us anything or give a shite what we think, so I don't expect them to provide evidence. I just don't expect other dons fans to tell to "get on board" without it. I also don't think most fans have even asked themselves the question, they just take what is said as gospel and roll with it. I don't think that's healthy.

Aye, fair doos. I think he's quickly becoming a scapegoat and I don't think he deserves it at the moment. Cunt better score against the huns though. And he better fucking celebrate.