RicoS321

I've never been convinced by McKenzie, and I don't think you drop Hayes for him away at Ibrox against a fast opponent. Ramsay maybe not fully fit. Bar a couple of slightly Ojo moments, tanking out of position for no reason, he's been good. The whole defence actually. McRorie really helps in there despite his final ball being honking. Ramirez putting in a shift but struggling with the ball. McLennan probably the weak link, but that could be as much to do with their setup allowing the space for tavernier as much as McLennan. Besuijen been okay. Overall, were doing okay, we look disciplined and well organised.

Polvara to come on and score a hat trick. Brown oot.

I agree. Exactly the same as the Utd guy at the weekend. However, it's important to note that it constitutes a penalty in today's game and VAR would definitely not have overturned. We would have had a three minute wait while the ref watched 18 slow motion replays, back and forth, to determine whether there was "contact" or not, all the while ignoring the fact that it's a contact sport.

He's the best defender at the club. Stronger than Bates, better concentration than Gallagher and better positionally than McRorie. We've tried to replace him and failed on numerous occasions. We should still be looking to replace him, but there's a very high percentage chance that we won't get someone better. We've been terrible at the back since he got injured.

That was poor. Today highlights what happens when you fail to recruit in three consecutive windows. We're way behind hearts in terms of the two squads. There's 6-7 of their players that would walk into our team. Their whole defence, the two up front and probably McKay. We've got 7 or 8 that need to be shifted in the summer.

Christ, it took us a long time to get into that game. We eventually do and score a perfectly fair goal. Overall though, they deserve their lead. I'd maybe consider McGeouch for Brown, albeit McGeouch a bit of a fanny. Kennedy been fairly anonymous too. It's not a great bench though.

Hearts look decent. By far the better side.

Looks like Ojo at right back, Hayes at left back and Brown back into midfield

Doesn't really excuse the lack of team line

You really don't get it do you? Dick Donald didn't go into debt to back Alex Ferguson. In other words, it didn't require the club to spend more than it took in to overcome the Huns and Tims. Our budget wasn't far removed from theirs. Today, it would require us to go into debt. Dick Donald would not have backed Alex Ferguson to overcome the scum today. Just go listen to sir Alex Ferguson, even he says the same.

I'm confused. Our best chairman was from Aberdeen. Our best manager and players were from the central belt. We don't want a manager from Aberdeen. Does that mean we don't want a manager or players from the central belt? It doesn't really seem to me like you know very much when it comes to getting Aberdeen their first league success in forty years. Which is strange, because normally when I'm wanting well articulated ideas, thought through and presented in an easy to digest manner, I immediately think of asking someone who grew up in the central belt.

The problem is that you're not sharing views on ways the club can move forwards. You've been asked multiple questions and ignored all of them. You're just shouting buzz phrases at your screen. To be fair, you have mentioned that you want fan ownership, which I think is a great idea. The biggest obstacle to fan ownership is people like you, unfortunately. People who ask for the world continuously, with zero ideas in how to get there. Fan ownership means no rich-man life-raft. You absolutely have to live within your means or you go to the wall (or a rich man comes in and buys out the fan ownesrhip). But imagining things is a very good starting point, so let's imagine Aberdeen win the league in, say, seven years time. Work us through the timeline from where we are now to a 43 year old Scott Brown lifting the trophy. What steps do we need to take to get the incremental improvements year on year? How do we get back to that high point under McInnes when we got our best (and anyone else outside the scum) ever points return of 75 - and maintaining it? Once we've got there, how would you get that total up to ~85 points and maintaining it? Then how do you propose getting it to around 90 in order that we might win a league? Would you envisage any structural changes that might weaken the duopoly, or do you think it can all be done by AFC?

1) You want someone like the Donalds (from Aberdeen) to buy the club 2) they mustn't be from Aberdeen 3) the club must be under fan ownership

I'm guessing they'll be split down the middle. Plenty of Clyde fans weren't happy first time around, but they weren't listened to. He can probably ply his rapey trade at that level without too much publicity, but he can count himself lucky.

Sounds like we could be in with a chance as Montgomery is apparently out. I'm heading into town shortly, I'll see if I can nick a traffic cone to replace him.

The Donalds had the guts not to speculate to accumulate. We had zero debt until Milne came on the scene. It's a question of how much you're willing to speculate. Hearts speculated significantly in the early part of the century and went bust, winning only a couple of cups in the process. Would that be the level of speculation? Operating regularly with wages more than turnover? How long for, and to what end? Would you agree that using hearts as a benchmark, we'd likely have to spend more than they did? What does speculate to accumulate even mean in the context of the current spfl? Would you be willing to accept gradual progress, or do you want it right now? You see, the problem that you have is the accumulate part of the equation. The level of speculation required to win the league is far more likely to see us going bust rather than to accumulate returns. The Huns are running at a ~£10M loss yearly and haven't yet reached the champions league - i.e. there has been no accumulation. Do you really want the Dons to carry that level of debt? I don't. But let's be honest here, you're not asking us to speculate to accumulate at all. You're asking Cormack to spend his own money, at his own risk, chasing a goal with extremely long odds very little return. Just be honest.

It's those bloody Ukrainians that are the real problem. Get them expelled, with a 3 goal victory for their next opponent.

Interesting you chose Bayern Munich and not the Tims, or the Huns! But you're right of course. The first step should be to get back challenging for 3rd after canning our last manager. Then we look at incremental gains beyond that. I have to admit, I couldn't give a shite whether fans think it's acceptable or not either, as that has no bearing on reality. I am interested in hearing LBM2021s ideas in where he thinks we can make the improvements behind the scenes or on the park in order to close that gap over - say - the next five years, and if that includes remaining within the 3:5 wages:turnover ratio. Also, I'd like to hear more about the areas in which Cormack is failing where Milne was a success. It'd be great if the explanations didn't include nebulous terms such as "belief", "ambition" and "thinking outside the box" without supplementary detail about what the fuck they actually mean. Over to you @LightbulbMoment2021

Settle down Stuart Cosgrove.

Holy crap, was it 1995 in Wigan today?

Just back. Bates selling the jerseys early doors and was shakey the rest of the half. He's constantly on his weak foot and it shows. Montgomery was gash but we had no choice and McKenzie was also gash recently. Besuijen had his best game and Ferguson had another strong performance. Another fantastic advert for summer football, the conditions were horrendous. It's not just the wind that made it bad, when the ball is speeding up as it flies towards you, but also on a rutty pitch, it's an entire lottery. All in all, agree with LA Don, okay given the circumstances

I don't think curses exist.

I'll get it, don't worry.

I don't think it's anything to do with the Tories. What you're getting at here is antithetical to our entire system. It's anti globalisation. Voting the Tories out won't change that, just as SNP haven't. There is no political path within our economic system that brings about what you suggest. Replacing fossil fuels isn't the answer. Removing the requirement to use that volume of energy is. Very few renewables are going to result in zero fossil fuel use in their production and transportation. There is little difference between buying Russia's oil and China's solar panels. I'm fairly sympathetic to your suggestion of producing more, and it should have been clear to everyone rushing to the supermarket upon first lockdown that we have zero contingency if something happens to our just in time supply chain. We'll be (the UK) in the absolute shit if Putin goes further than Ukraine and we're forced to defend a NATO country. We haven't got the infrastructure or resilience for war. So it's imperative that we sit on our hands and shout from the sidelines for now.

Whether it's close is irrelevant, whether it's true is more pertinent. It's as true in Kazakhstan as it is in Georgia or Ukraine. As the Minsk agreement recognised, the various parts of Ukraine are not homogeneous, neither in language, custom or religion. There's as much argument for parts of Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Georgia to be autonomous as there is Scotland to be independent, or Ireland to be unified. Those decisions aren't Russia's to make of course, and certainly not by force, but it's undeniable that there was an uncomfortable imbalance to the arbitrary borders of Ukraine.