OrlandoDon Posted May 30, 2008 Report Posted May 30, 2008 I remember when we signed Charlie Nicholas - what a boost it gave the club, the fans, the players, the dressing room etc and had a definite impact on attendances. I think I am right in saying Hans Gilhaus had an impact on attendances too. What would it cost to get a player of that ability and reputation today? Nicholas was 400k nearly 20 years ago! Gow and Riordan are not in the same class as these guys yet I feel we won't even stretch to try to get them. I think fans are dying for a boost - anyone think of a player less than a million who would actually inspire the fans to be excited about next year? Quote
Sharpie Posted May 30, 2008 Report Posted May 30, 2008 Aberdeen had the clout to attract big players back then. Different situation now. Quote
OrlandoDon Posted May 30, 2008 Author Report Posted May 30, 2008 Agree, 400k now is like a 4 million pound player these days, but pulling off the Charlie Nicholas signing was still a surprise - to me it showed the ambition of the board. What kind of signing would inspire these days that is still realistic? I personally do think Riordan and Gow are realistic with a 'creative' contract to keep our wage structure but no ambition from the board rules them out. We've heard WM say big name signings could happen but what does that mean? Quote
boboisared Posted May 30, 2008 Report Posted May 30, 2008 Agree, 400k now is like a 4 million pound player these days, but pulling off the Charlie Nicholas signing was still a surprise - to me it showed the ambition of the board. What kind of signing would inspire these days that is still realistic? I personally do think Riordan and Gow are realistic with a 'creative' contract to keep our wage structure but no ambition from the board rules them out. We've heard WM say big name signings could happen but what does that mean? There going to sign someone with a long name so they can make money off the shirt printing. Quote
Guest swaddon Posted May 31, 2008 Report Posted May 31, 2008 There going to sign someone with a long name so they can make money off the shirt printing. Former PSG midfielder Eric Rabesandratana and ex-Ger Alexei Mikhailatchenko have been spotted leaving Pittodrie this week... Quote
Reekie_Red Posted June 1, 2008 Report Posted June 1, 2008 Simple answer to this is: Back then, we were running on a POSITIVE bank balance, we were the SECOND biggest club in Scotland (cos Celtic were in absolute turmoil until around 1994/95, but most Celtic fans don't know this cos most Celtic fans didn't become Celtic fans until Fergus McCann took the helm), and we were one of the biggest draws for any player cos we were in the hunt for titles, were regularly in Europe, and cup finals were a bit of a common thing. Now, all we can hope for in the way of big signings is the hope that someone who ONCE was a big name decides to come to Aberdeen to see himself through to retirement. Someone of the caliber of Barthez, for example, would probably say yes to a year with the Dons in his twilight years. But back in the day we were capable of getting players in who had a reputation and who were also NOT past their best. Quote
rocket_scientist Posted June 2, 2008 Report Posted June 2, 2008 Boro got Ravanelli. Dundee got Cannigia. Surprise big name signings are possible where the will and the skill to do it is there. Quote
boboisared Posted June 2, 2008 Report Posted June 2, 2008 I'd say the likes of Hignett, Leighton and Seve could be looked at the same way. A big signing doesn't neccesarilly have to be an already well known player, it's what they do for you. Quote
Reekie_Red Posted June 3, 2008 Report Posted June 3, 2008 Leighton Still one of the happiest days in recent times when Leighton came back to Aberdeen. I mind the day we signed him, my Killie-supporting flatmate said "might as well hand you guys the title right now then!". Leighton was the best keeper in the league by a mile, even at that stage. Unfortunately for him, he had Whyte, Inglis, Gary Smith (the second version) and Tzvetanov infront of him, hence why we most definitely did NOT win the league that year. Quote
Reekie_Red Posted June 3, 2008 Report Posted June 3, 2008 To be perfectly honest, I don't think Cannigia went to Dundee for the football. Dundee's probably one of the easiest ports in the country to smuggle drugs into. Why else would he suggested that Maradonna would be happy at home in that cold, smelly, depressing shithole? Quote
OrlandoDon Posted June 3, 2008 Author Report Posted June 3, 2008 How about a Darren Huckerby type for example. Lee Trundle? Give a decent signing on fee financed by the board (which won't happen!!!), maybe a good win/goal bonus, and keep him on the same wage structure. A little excitement, no? Quote
rocket_scientist Posted June 3, 2008 Report Posted June 3, 2008 How about a board that gives money to finance the basics, followed by a manager who can spot a decent player. No, too much to ask... Quote
Superstar Tradesman Posted June 3, 2008 Report Posted June 3, 2008 John Hartson would be a 'big' signing. Quote
Reekie_Red Posted June 4, 2008 Report Posted June 4, 2008 In that respect, why not just go for Stevie Fulton. Surely he must be the BIGGEST player we could ever wish to have on our books. Quote
sheepheid Posted June 4, 2008 Report Posted June 4, 2008 Let's just bring Mark Yardley out of retirement!! Quote
stubo72 Posted June 5, 2008 Report Posted June 5, 2008 I remember when we signed Charlie Nicholas - what a boost it gave the club, the fans, the players, the dressing room etc and had a definite impact on attendances. What would it cost to get a player of that ability and reputation today? Nicholas was 400k nearly 20 years ago! Aye, and he wiz pish as far as I can mind?! We can live without names for the sake of names... Quote
Holyjoe Posted June 5, 2008 Report Posted June 5, 2008 Let's just bring Mark Yardley out of retirement!! Yes, please. Quote
BobbyBiscuit Posted June 5, 2008 Report Posted June 5, 2008 Aye, and he wiz pish as far as I can mind?! We can live without names for the sake of names... Are you fishing? Quote
stubo72 Posted June 5, 2008 Report Posted June 5, 2008 Are you fishing? Nah man. I just seem to remember hating the wee fucker. Spent more time on his arse than actually effecting the game, as I recall. Champagne Charlie personified. I was just sayin' that big names don't always mean you get a good player. I'd much rather some (hopefully above) average, trophy hungry SPL player than some dude wi a reputation and nothing left to prove. Quote
Sharpie Posted June 5, 2008 Report Posted June 5, 2008 I thought Nicholas was an excellent player. Loads of vision and linked up brilliantly. I don't think he influenced every game he played in mind but he certainly had a touch of class. Quote
Guest swaddon Posted June 5, 2008 Report Posted June 5, 2008 As far as I can remember, Charlie Nicholas wasn't all that good until we signed Hans Gillhaus. Quote
KGB Posted June 6, 2008 Report Posted June 6, 2008 Brilliant! Let's heve a revisionist Charlie Nicholas was shite thread. Quote
BobbyBiscuit Posted June 6, 2008 Report Posted June 6, 2008 Charlie Nicholas was a lazy bastard from what I remember. Might well have been a lazy bastard but he was a brilliant player for us. Nicholas had a lazy style about him, always wanted the ball to feet instead of ahead of him... perhaps because he could actually play football (and of course, couldn't run). Nicholas is easily one of my favourite Dons players of all time. Quote
Sharpie Posted June 6, 2008 Report Posted June 6, 2008 Might well have been a lazy bastard but he was a brilliant player for us. Nicholas had a lazy style about him, always wanted the ball to feet instead of ahead of him... perhaps because he could actually play football (and of course, couldn't run). Nicholas is easily one of my favourite Dons players of all time. Agreed. Jim Bett was labelled a lazy bastard as well but by fuck could he pick a pass. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.