Madbadteacher Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 In general, or just because of QT? Quote
mizer Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 In general, or just because of QT? A bit of both. I think he may be a physical manifestation of the Daily Mail. Quote
glasgow sheep Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 A bit of both. I think he may be a physical manifestation of the Daily Mail. Liked the Lib Dem lass. Only one that had something sensible to say that wasn't jumping on the usual bandwagons. Shame the rest of her party aren't of such quality. The non-political guests were horrific. Madely is a prick and Andrew Roberts is repulsive. Quote
Kowalski Posted January 22, 2010 Author Report Posted January 22, 2010 Liked the Lib Dem lass. Only one that had something sensible to say that wasn't jumping on the usual bandwagons. Shame the rest of her party aren't of such quality. The non-political guests were horrific. Madely is a prick and Andrew Roberts is repulsive. Vince Cable is great, and Charles Kennedy is still excellent and really should still be the leader. As for Madeley. He's a prick, but I don't disagree with what he said about protecting your family/home from burglars/intruders. Quote
glasgow sheep Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 Vince Cable is great, and Charles Kennedy is still excellent and really should still be the leader. As for Madeley. He's a prick, but I don't disagree with what he said about protecting your family/home from burglars/intruders. There is protecting your home and then there is chasing a guy down the street and battering him till he has brain damage. That whole discussion was about semantics (I mean what the fuck is the difference between "reasonable force" and "disproportionate force") and posturing by the tories on the panel. They guy was correctly found guilty but perhaps didn't warrent 9yrs in prison. The appeal court did not acquit him but felt that his sentance was too long. Quote
Kowalski Posted January 22, 2010 Author Report Posted January 22, 2010 There is protecting your home and then there is chasing a guy down the street and battering him till he has brain damage. That whole discussion was about semantics (I mean what the fuck is the difference between "reasonable force" and "disproportionate force") and posturing by the tories on the panel. They guy was correctly found guilty but perhaps didn't warrent 9yrs in prison. The appeal court did not acquit him but felt that his sentance was too long. Most people would go mental if there were family were tied up by intruders whilst fearing the worst. I'd have wanted to have kicked fuck out of the cunt too. Mind you, did Madeley not once try and sneak a crate of wine out of Tesco? So a bit rich there. Quote
Guest rocket debris Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 Madeley was disgusting. It was as if he has political aspirations of his own. That's one wife not even I would shag. The wifie going on about not being able to kick fuck out of a burglaregar was talking bollocks. When it comes to matters of assault, females should be excluded from the debate neither being capable of the act and also having cyclical bleeding for which in the old days they would have had to move out and in to the shed by the river. There is a difference between Scots and English criminal law with regard to self defence. If I were to find any cunt in my house in the middle of the night, it's either him or me and whilst it's not a fight to the death necessarily - although again that depends of the weapons of rocket destruction he's taken with him - it is definitely a fight to the hospital. I sleep with a hammer next to the bed. Never needed it yet but I would have no hesitation in blootering the bastard safe in the knowledge that my self defence will acquit me in the criminal court. Quote
Sharpie Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 Madeley was disgusting. It was as if he has political aspirations of his own. That's one wife not even I would shag. The wifie going on about not being able to kick fuck out of a burglaregar was talking bollocks. When it comes to matters of assault, females should be excluded from the debate neither being capable of the act and also having cyclical bleeding for which in the old days they would have had to move out and in to the shed by the river. There is a difference between Scots and English criminal law with regard to self defence. If I were to find any cunt in my house in the middle of the night, it's either him or me and whilst it's not a fight to the death necessarily - although again that depends of the weapons of rocket destruction he's taken with him - it is definitely a fight to the hospital. I sleep with a hammer next to the bed. Never needed it yet but I would have no hesitation in blootering the bastard safe in the knowledge that my self defence will acquit me in the criminal court. Nice one. It could double as a sex aid. Very versatile the old hammer. Quote
Sharpie Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 The Big Questions on a Sunday morning. Cracking hangover TV. You cannae beat listening to religious nuts havering pish when you're struggling and clinging on to life after a night on the sauce. Quote
Guest rocket debris Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 Nice one. It could double as a sex aid. Very versatile the old hammer. Struggling to find the aid aspect here. I never put dirty tools up my wife. The rubber handle could stimulate I guess but were you thinking the S & M angle? Never been into gimp dressing and buttock lashing myself, never having had the privelege of a top private boarding school education or maybe just an old fashioned consent extractor. Quote
Sharpie Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 Yeah yeah, heard it, all you ever do is the missionary position? Quote
Guest rocket debris Posted January 22, 2010 Report Posted January 22, 2010 Naturally, as it is natural. Anything else is for perverts. Quote
Sharpie Posted January 24, 2010 Report Posted January 24, 2010 The last 'Big Question' this morning was, 'Does the Haiti earthquake prove that God does not exist?' Lots of pish debate but the answer is simply, no. I've yet to hear any evidence that the fucker does exist though. Quote
Guest rocket debris Posted January 24, 2010 Report Posted January 24, 2010 Denying the true nature of Calderwood is one thing, denying the existence of God is another. You can't have "evidence". You feel his presence. Apparently. Those fundamentalists are pretty convinced. Yet to meet a dogmaticist who isn't a scary maddo though so as a member of the jury, I'm afraid we haven't reached a verdict. Agnosticism rules. Atheism is for dogmatics on the other extreme who say No. Quote
BobbyBiscuit Posted January 24, 2010 Report Posted January 24, 2010 Those fundamentalists are pretty convinced. Yet to meet a dogmaticist who isn't a scary maddo though so as a member of the jury, I'm afraid we haven't reached a verdict. Agnosticism rules. Atheism is for dogmatics on the other extreme who say No. Exactly my thoughts on the matter. Find both "sides" equally nauseating as the other. Quote
Sharpie Posted January 24, 2010 Report Posted January 24, 2010 The Bible: A History. Tackled creation tonight. Howard Jacobson tried to find a middle ground between the religious and the athiest fundamentalists. Reasonably interesting. Quote
rocknroll Posted January 24, 2010 Report Posted January 24, 2010 Watched that Rock N Chips, was alright. Quote
dave_min Posted January 25, 2010 Report Posted January 25, 2010 The Bible: A History. Tackled creation tonight. Howard Jacobson tried to find a middle ground between the religious and the athiest fundamentalists. Reasonably interesting. Was watching that too, was good. Looking forward to the rest of the series too. Quote
BobbyBiscuit Posted January 25, 2010 Report Posted January 25, 2010 Watched that Rock N Chips, was alright. Watched that too, was pleasantly surprised, I thought it may have been pretty painful viewing but it was not bad. Also watched a programme on FX about Neo-Nazis in the U.S. Was pretty interesting, showed a couple of riots between Neo-Nazis and Anti-Racist groups and police. Always seemed to be only the Anti-Racists who would be arrested though due to free speech laws in the U.S. Not surprisingly, there were some amount of utter cunts and brain dead mentalists on it, as is par for the course with these progs. Quote
bilbobaggins Posted January 25, 2010 Report Posted January 25, 2010 Anyone who takes such a strong position on anything, so that they appear entrenched, is to be mistrusted. Quote
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted January 25, 2010 Report Posted January 25, 2010 Anyone who takes such a strong position on anything, so that they appear entrenched, is to be mistrusted. JIMMY IS GOD!!!! Quote
amp Posted January 25, 2010 Report Posted January 25, 2010 Celebrity Big Brother is very entertaining this year - have been watching every night. Also been watching a lot of UFC on ESPN America, as well as NHL. Shame the live games start around midnight. Deadliest catch is also becoming a firm favourite of mine, having not watched it for a few months. Quote
mizer Posted January 29, 2010 Report Posted January 29, 2010 Charlie Brookers Newswipe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtGSXMuWMR4&feature=player_embedded Quote
glasgow sheep Posted January 29, 2010 Report Posted January 29, 2010 Charlie Brookers Newswipe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtGSXMuWMR4&feature=player_embedded +1 Excellent stuff Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.