Jute Posted August 24 Report Posted August 24 15 hours ago, tom_widdows said: 2hrs to walk 3.1miles? 3.6 miles from station to Cinieworld according to google maps and new location is a bit further along Kingsway so added 10 minutes to their 1 hour 35 estimate to Cinieworld. Vast majority of that uphill. Nobody is really walking that. Only way of reaching the site will be car or bus. I am cynical about the claims about shuttle buses as bus companies just don’t carry enough capacity to run existing services never mind extra match day services. It will also add additional cost to those travelling by public transport. 1 Quote
Slim Posted August 24 Report Posted August 24 1 hour ago, Panda said: It's not the Pittodrie footprint you need to paste onto it though, it's the footprint from a new modern stadium. Unless AZ Alkmaar's stadium can fit on it then gtf. Nae bother. Plenty of room all around. Probably don't need the houses in the north west corner inside the footprint, but I think they're being demolished to make room for the Berryden dualler if that ever goes ahead anyway. Could also rotate it 45 degrees and move closer to George Street so not building directly over the railway. You'd need to compensate the building owners of the industrial units but I reckon that would cost less than the extra ground work and piling you'd need to do to put the stadium next to the beach. The stadium itself would actually fit inside the empty site itself too, but I guess then you'd need car parking, emergency access, etc, to be underneath the stadium. Either way, a far better option than anything that's been proposed so far. Quote
tom_widdows Posted August 24 Report Posted August 24 41 minutes ago, Slim said: Nae bother. Plenty of room all around. Probably don't need the houses in the north west corner inside the footprint, but I think they're being demolished to make room for the Berryden dualler if that ever goes ahead anyway. Could also rotate it 45 degrees and move closer to George Street so not building directly over the railway. You'd need to compensate the building owners of the industrial units but I reckon that would cost less than the extra ground work and piling you'd need to do to put the stadium next to the beach. The stadium itself would actually fit inside the empty site itself too, but I guess then you'd need car parking, emergency access, etc, to be underneath the stadium. Either way, a far better option than anything that's been proposed so far. You need enough space around the stadium for the entire capacity to be evacuated into a controlled space whilst still allowing space for emergency vehicles. You also need to plan for 20000 odd people suddenly packing into an area with infrastructure not currently designed to accommodate it. Road, pavement and junction improvements, traffic management Utility upgrades etc Football stadiums dont get 'compulsary purchase orders. One reason Arsenal's stadium was so expensive was not only did they have to buy the surrounding buildings, they also had to buy replacement houses/ commercial properties for the occupants. Stamford Bridge's redevelopment was effectively cancelled due to the objections of one lone householder. Carparking under a very large structure with significant weight fluctuations on former victorian industrial site with an underground stream on one side and a railway tunnel on the other? Network Rail held up a housing project near Edinburgh because 4 houses were too close to the roof of a tunnel. When asked what they think about having a stadium built close if not on top of their tunnel the short answer will ne 'No' and the long one 'FUCK no' Finally Emergency Access 'under a building'?! Yeah you really want to be parking the fire engine under the raging inferno. Gonna throw this out there. Whatever you may think or Architects, Stadium Designers, Engineers, Town Planners, and the Officials at the Club, do you think if Broadford works was a feasible they wouldnt have considered it? 2 Quote
Slim Posted August 24 Report Posted August 24 So option 1 with a big enough chequebook for compo/brown envelopes then, sorted! Will still be cheaper than the beach option. Quote
Panda Posted August 24 Report Posted August 24 (edited) 2 hours ago, Jute said: 3.6 miles from station to Cinieworld according to google maps and new location is a bit further along Kingsway so added 10 minutes to their 1 hour 35 estimate to Cinieworld. Vast majority of that uphill. Nobody is really walking that. Only way of reaching the site will be car or bus. I am cynical about the claims about shuttle buses as bus companies just don’t carry enough capacity to run existing services never mind extra match day services. It will also add additional cost to those travelling by public transport. But the thing is though, where is everyone travelling from? You're measuring the distance from the station - how many Dundee fans travel to Dens Park from the train station just now? Dundee only has two stations (the other Broughty Ferry) so my guess is very few. Bus station - buses don't just stop at the station though. Many routes will go past Camperdown and there'll be new ones added. What are the current travel options to get to Dens Park? A lot of people will need to just take a slight detour to get to Camperdown if going by car or bus. It's entirely different from the Kingsford/Pittodrie comparison, as these two sites aren't that far apart. Edited August 24 by Panda Quote
tom_widdows Posted November 22 Report Posted November 22 Nothing new on the stadium saga im assuming (although keep selling out and a lack of capacity discussion my appear)? Anyway this is apparently Everton's new stadium's answer to Anfield's Kop. The design brief was to get fans as close to the pitch as possible Quote
Tyrant Posted November 26 Report Posted November 26 BBC Gossip column saying that the cost of the new grun is no longer £50m but £80m. I will not name the "source" out of principle but that's Duk's price tag gone up drastically. Quote
manc_don Posted November 26 Report Posted November 26 Also noted in the financial report that we’re not moving from pittodrie for the foreseeable. None of this surprises me. Quote
RicoS321 Posted November 26 Report Posted November 26 8 minutes ago, manc_don said: Also noted in the financial report that we’re not moving from pittodrie for the foreseeable. None of this surprises me. Good. Pittodrie is fucking ace. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.