SeeBass Posted August 3, 2009 Report Posted August 3, 2009 It never ceases to amaze me the amount of mistakes in football reports these days. I noticed one in both The Press and Journal and Daily Record on Friday morning. The latter stated in the results round-up that subsitute Kascak scored the fifth not Horava and the P&J claimed on the back page that Petr netted number three, yet in the match analysis on the inside it was apparently Janotka which hit the third. Shoddy, shoddy work. Quote
tom_widdows Posted August 3, 2009 Report Posted August 3, 2009 It never ceases to amaze me the amount of mistakes in football reports these days. I noticed one in both The Press and Journal and Daily Record on Friday morning. The latter stated in the results round-up that subsitute Kascak scored the fifth not Horava and the P&J claimed on the back page that Petr netted number three, yet in the match analysis on the inside it was apparently Janotka which hit the third. Shoddy, shoddy work. Add to that 'This is the worst home defeat in Europe since the 3-1 defeat to Torino' Quote
glasgowdon Posted August 3, 2009 Report Posted August 3, 2009 It never ceases to amaze me the amount of mistakes in football reports these days. I noticed one in both The Press and Journal and Daily Record on Friday morning. The latter stated in the results round-up that subsitute Kascak scored the fifth not Horava and the P&J claimed on the back page that Petr netted number three, yet in the match analysis on the inside it was apparently Janotka which hit the third. Shoddy, shoddy work. You'd know all about woeful writing. Quote
Goldie03 Posted August 3, 2009 Report Posted August 3, 2009 You'd know all about woeful writing. Ooh harsh Quote
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted August 3, 2009 Report Posted August 3, 2009 Woeful. The spelling is f-a-i-r. Yer right though, Seebass. These papers are always full of inaccuracies. The thing to remember is they rely on the majority of the readership nae to have a clue what's going on. Importantly, many of the readership will have forgotten the back page by the time they read the rest of the article. You can blame Big Brother and Alcopops for that. And of course Jimmy Calderwood Fayre enough Yager. Quote
Tyrant Posted August 4, 2009 Report Posted August 4, 2009 Aye it's nothing new. It's something I've come to expect. When I read papers I read them purely for entertainment rather than finding out what the news is. Quote
Reekie_Red Posted August 4, 2009 Report Posted August 4, 2009 These papers are always full of inaccuracies Like the Mirror Group papers. If in doubt, wheel out the Toastergate fiasco. I saw it cropped up again in The Mirror a few days ago. Couldnae believe it. It was a fuckin dodgy toaster that was a fire-hazard. It was apparently replaced the following day with a new one!! Bet you the Mirror Group didn't bother reporting that one, eh? Course not. Then they'd have one less crap-ola story to wheel out about the Dons to keep their knuckle-dragging readership amused. FYI - I only read the Mirror headlines because they appear on the newsnow newsfeeds everysooften. Quote
Ptayles Posted August 5, 2009 Report Posted August 5, 2009 Where is the evening express' mention! They were able to have Terry Wogan as 70 and 71 on the same day Quote
manc_don Posted August 5, 2009 Report Posted August 5, 2009 Where is the evening express' mention! They were able to have Terry Wogan as 70 and 71 on the same day Surely the EE would be the founder of such crimes. Quote
manc_don Posted August 10, 2009 Report Posted August 10, 2009 Seems like AFC premium seem to be woeful at writing as well. The usual Chris a.k.a "Phil McGuire" Maguire mistake. Nice to know they know our team. Quote
Mackie's ace! Posted August 10, 2009 Report Posted August 10, 2009 None of them seem to able to spell. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.