BobbyBiscuit Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 ESPN reporting that there's been a row between McGhee and Langfield. Quote
maverick sheep Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 Pre match interview had mcghee saying all changes were enforced but made no mention of Clangers. Doubt we'll see him play for us again. Fuckin joke. Quote
mizer Posted April 24, 2010 Author Report Posted April 24, 2010 1 nil to us.ok first half, espy camera guide girl is hot Quote
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 Pre match interview had mcghee saying all changes were enforced but made no mention of Clangers. Doubt we'll see him play for us again. Fuckin joke. Not like Clangers has form for that or anything is it? Quote
maverick sheep Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 We know he's capable though. Nelson looks just as likely to drop a clanger but without the shot stoppin attributes. Aluko's made more saves than him today. Quote
quirie Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 Though Nelson was decent enough today. Was unlucky that the ball bounced off him for the goal, similar to Langfield vs Athletico in the uefa cup couple of years ago, but someone should of been marking the saints guy. Draw was a fair result though Quote
maverick sheep Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 Like espn are saying, defence gave nelson no help for the goal, but he didn't exactly palm it away to safety. i'm not overly impressed considering that was all he had to do today and he also got away with a couple of rash decisions to come into no man's land in the 1st half. i'm really getting worried about the continuing weakening of the team by replacing our players with worse than we had. Quote
El Padre™ Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 ESPN reporting that there's been a row between McGhee and Langfield. McGhee said he want's to split the remaining games between Nelson and Langfield. Quote
Sharpie Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 McGhee said he want's to split the remaining games between Nelson and Langfield. I hope he changes his mind now. Quote
BobbyBiscuit Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 Like espn are saying, defence gave nelson no help for the goal, but he didn't exactly palm it away to safety. i'm not overly impressed considering that was all he had to do today and he also got away with a couple of rash decisions to come into no man's land in the 1st half. . Thought he looked ropey on cross balls. Came when he shouldn't have, didn't when he should. McGhee said he want's to split the remaining games between Nelson and Langfield. May well be the case, just repeating what they said but they did suggest that something happened during the week and seemed rather common knowledge amongst all their team. Quote
tsr Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 Nelson had a decent game, doubt Langfield would have done any better. He has to get game time imo. Overall it was a good game to watch but we more than rode our luck, don't think we deserved a point. Quote
maverick sheep Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 McGhee said he want's to split the remaining games between Nelson and Langfield. I don't mind the idea of playing Nelson (even in all the remaining games) to see if he's worth keeping, same reason as I want to see youngsters. I just got the impression from the lack of mention of it by Mcghee pre-match, while explaining all the other changes, it seemed to tie in with the falling out/punting langfield story. That would worry me because I don't see Nelson, or anyone we could afford being good enough for 1st team. Quote
McMaster Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 Was Marshall actually playing today?? I am sure i saw him coming out the tunnel and he was mentioned in the team line up?!!! But that was it, VERY quiet game for a player on loan trying to gain a contract! Take me hat off tae Grassi today! Played fairly well and showed a bit o passion. Still reckon he should stick to using his head and forget kicking the ball!!! Quote
maverick sheep Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 Nelson had a decent game, doubt Langfield would have done any better. He has to get game time imo. Overall it was a good game to watch but we more than rode our luck, don't think we deserved a point. Fair enough if you meant 'good' as in, good compared to the rest of the season. If you meant 'good' as in, a decent standard of footie and entertainment, I'd have to disagree. I thought it was pesh. Quote
El Padre™ Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 I think Nelson looks like he could do ok with a run of games under his belt. Maybe we should sign a dedicated goalie coach to help him on? That would be crazy...... Quote
tsr Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 Fair enough if you meant 'good' as in, good compared to the rest of the season. If you meant 'good' as in, a decent standard of footie and entertainment, I'd have to disagree. I thought it was pesh. I was comparing it to the Falkirk game which was truly awful. Quote
mizer Posted April 24, 2010 Author Report Posted April 24, 2010 Thought Nelson wasnt too bad, very nervous at points though. Grassi did decent again (shock) at full back then decent at centre back! Foster was the captain on that pitch, organised the shape and then was maraginilisled by being put out wide and then we lost the goal. The wall was atrocious and nobody seemed to know what was going on. Maclean is a slow lazy cunt, Kerr is a cunt and Marshall is a useless cunt. A draw was the correct result as we sat back and waitred for the equaliser. Quote
BobbyBiscuit Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 thought MacLean was one of the better performers to be honest. Quote
mizer Posted April 24, 2010 Author Report Posted April 24, 2010 He was a lazy cunt, even Lee Miller would have been embarrassed by his lack of effort. Quote
BobbyBiscuit Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 I think you've taken that too far. Quote
mizer Posted April 24, 2010 Author Report Posted April 24, 2010 I think you've taken that too far. Worryingly I dont think I have. He really was just sauntering about up front. Quote
tsr Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 I don't think that's the case, I would say he needs to gain a good yard of fitness though as he's put in a couple of dodgy tackles as a result of being pushed off the ball to easily. He was defo working hard though! Quote
BobbyBiscuit Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 Worryingly I dont think I have. He really was just sauntering about up front. I know you have. Quote
Mentorred Posted April 24, 2010 Report Posted April 24, 2010 Thought it was a terrible game to watch. We looked like we were scared to lose, even though we are now safe. Was not that impressed with Nelson. At one point Ifil left the ball for him to come out and get and he just stood there and let the Saint Johnstone player in. If that is Mcghee's idea of entertaining football then all I can say is next please. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.