stoney Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Most of the goals we are losing having been from corners................So in a sense you are correct but only be default Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted November 5, 2010 Author Share Posted November 5, 2010 Most of the goals we are losing having been from corners................So in a sense you are correct but only be default Not most, but lots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maverick sheep Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 We're shit down the wing defensively and zander and jerel (and McArdle from what I've seen of him) are shit in the air. Where we're MOST shit really doesn't matter when the basic conclusion is we need a whole new defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoney Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 I think we need a right wing back - If diamond pulled his finger out his pooper we would be much better off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyBiscuit Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 just a plain old normal right back would suffice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentorred Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 just a plain old normal right back would suffice. \ There is a guy at Rangers who does not play that often that could fill the role. Maybe we could do a swap deal with one of our injured strikers when the transfer window opens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoney Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Is that the striker boy we loaned them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Dont think breaking teams down is our problem, we are scoring more goals per game on average than we have done for the past 10 years. 2010/11 - 1.4 goals a game 2009/10 - 0.9 goals a game 2008/09 - 1.1 goals a game 2007/08 - 1.3 goals a game 2006/07 - 1.5 goals a game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoney Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 If you are going to do something, do it properly Stats are from start of season to end of October 2010 - 2011 Season 13 games - 22 goals 1.69 goals per game. 2009 - 2010 Season 13 games - 10 goals 0.76 goals per game. 2008 - 2009 Season 12 games - 12 goals 1.00 goal per game. 2007 - 2008 Season 15 games - 23 goals 1.53 goals per game. 2006 - 2007 Season 13 games - 14 goals 1.07 goals per game. 2005 - 2006 Season 15 games - 22 goals 1.46 goals per game. 2004 - 2005 Season 10 games - 9 goals 0.9 goals per game. 2003 - 2004 Season 10 games - 9 goals 0.9 goals per game. 2002 - 2003 Season 12 games - 13 goals 1.08 goals per game. 2001 - 2002 Season 12 games - 21 goals 1.75 goals per game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maverick sheep Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 just a plain old normal right back would suffice. I'm going to see how the next couple of games go before agreeing on that one If you are going to do something, do it properly Stats are from start of season to end of October 2010 - 2011 Season 13 games - 22 goals 1.69 goals per game. 2009 - 2010 Season 13 games - 10 goals 0.76 goals per game. 2008 - 2009 Season 12 games - 12 goals 1.00 goal per game. 2007 - 2008 Season 15 games - 23 goals 1.53 goals per game. 2006 - 2007 Season 13 games - 14 goals 1.07 goals per game. 2005 - 2006 Season 15 games - 22 goals 1.46 goals per game. 2004 - 2005 Season 10 games - 9 goals 0.9 goals per game. 2003 - 2004 Season 10 games - 9 goals 0.9 goals per game. 2002 - 2003 Season 12 games - 13 goals 1.08 goals per game. 2001 - 2002 Season 12 games - 21 goals 1.75 goals per game. All that effort just to prove yourself equally wrong...I can't believe people around these parts question your intelligence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted November 5, 2010 Author Share Posted November 5, 2010 If you are going to do something, do it properly Stats are from start of season to end of October 2010 - 2011 Season 13 games - 22 goals 1.69 goals per game. 2009 - 2010 Season 13 games - 10 goals 0.76 goals per game. 2008 - 2009 Season 12 games - 12 goals 1.00 goal per game. 2007 - 2008 Season 15 games - 23 goals 1.53 goals per game. 2006 - 2007 Season 13 games - 14 goals 1.07 goals per game. 2005 - 2006 Season 15 games - 22 goals 1.46 goals per game. 2004 - 2005 Season 10 games - 9 goals 0.9 goals per game. 2003 - 2004 Season 10 games - 9 goals 0.9 goals per game. 2002 - 2003 Season 12 games - 13 goals 1.08 goals per game. 2001 - 2002 Season 12 games - 21 goals 1.75 goals per game. Can I get that in a graph? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrant Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Bar and/or Pie chart if you don't mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoney Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 I'm going to see how the next couple of games go before agreeing on that one All that effort just to prove yourself equally wrong...I can't believe people around these parts question your intelligence we are scoring more goals per game on average than we have done for the past 10 years. :wave: :wave: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madbadteacher Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Dumbarton have just sent us back one Stirling Smith from a loaner. Was he not some sort of full-back type? (I do realise I'm fairly clutching at the old straws here) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harcus Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 :wave: :wave: Not sure where the confusion is? You stated the past ten years. The past ten years, including this season, stretches back as far as 2001/02, the same season in which we scored an average of 1.75 goals per game between the start of the season and the end of October, to use your own incredibly contrived set of statistics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoney Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 The past 9 years doesnt really have the same ring to it though does it. Nothing wrong with the stats, unless you dont like Mark Mcghee that is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted November 5, 2010 Author Share Posted November 5, 2010 Bar and/or Pie chart if you don't mind. Dont think a pie chart would work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyBiscuit Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 The past 9 years doesnt really have the same ring to it though does it. Nothing wrong with the stats, unless you dont like Mark Mcghee that is Please just stop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 The past 9 years doesnt really have the same ring to it though does it. Nothing wrong with the stats, unless you dont like Mark Mcghee that is Here's a stat, 8th. I don't know Mark McGhee well enough to know whether I like him or not and frankly I don't really care if he's a nice guy or not. He isn't doing a good enough fucking job. Now, as BB asked. Stop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.