Tommy Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 As every dons supporter know we are in dire need of some full backs. In your opinions who would you take on in the transfer window (within reason obviously ie no Sergio Ramos') Quote
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Gonna be a struggle to get anyone, bad time for any club to be desperate, this shit could and should be done in the summer. Quote
bilbobaggins Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Maybury and Hart? I know it's a step back but both can defend and we need to start being difficult to beat again. Quote
glasgow sheep Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Maybury and Hart? I know it's a step back but both can defend and we need to start being difficult to beat again. Hart getting a regular game for Hibs under CC is he not and I'm sure Maybury is back in the SPL somewhere. Lets be honest I would imagine anyone that calls themselves a full back would be better than our current options of Ifil or kids Quote
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Hart getting a regular game for Hibs under CC is he not and I'm sure Maybury is back in the SPL somewhere. Lets be honest I would imagine anyone that calls themselves a full back would be better than our current options of Ifil or kids Maybury (who's at St Johnstone is he not?) and Hart would require fees. If McGhee wanted them then give him the money we would ordinarily and justifiably have used paying him off to support him bringing in (and getting rid of) players. Quote
Guest ally s Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Sign up David McNamee until the summer. Got to be worth a shout. Quote
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Decent shout Ally. Cheap and cheerful and a full back. Quote
Tommy Posted November 12, 2010 Author Report Posted November 12, 2010 What about Sam Williamson (ex man city player 23 YO without a club after being released by wrexham) better than nowt Quote
Sandaldinho Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 what ever happened to Basey? Quote
stoney Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 The board wouldnt release more funds to sign him after paton refused to go on loan. Quote
Kowalski Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 McGhee chose to spend the money allocated to him for wages in other areas Fixed for you Quote
stoney Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 On Paul Hartley..........Or would you rather have the left back :lolabove: I know who i'd rather have at the club. Quote
Kowalski Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 On Paul Hartley..........Or would you rather have the left back :lolabove: I know who i'd rather have at the club. I would rather he'd got both and not added more strikers. Quote
stoney Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 We didnt add anymore strikers to the wage bill Quote
RDU_64 Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 what ever happened to Basey? The one that got away. He in now at Barnet, on a four month contract, who are currently bottom of League Two. Quote
BigAl Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 We didnt add anymore strikers to the wage bill What are Vernon and Magennis then Quote
RDU_64 Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 On Paul Hartley..........Or would you rather have the left back :lolabove: I know who i'd rather have at the club. What are you laughing for? A few days ago you were saying how it would have made the world of difference if McGhee had signed Basey. Quote
stoney Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 The one that got away. He in now at Barnet, on a four month contract, who are currently bottom of League Two. Maybe they should have signed 11 Grant Baseys then. What has that got to do with anything? Liverpool were joint bottom of the league for a while - does that make all their players shit? What are Vernon and Magennis then Signed before Hartley, one signed before the end of last season. What are you laughing for? A few days ago you were saying how it would have made the world of difference if McGhee had signed Basey. It would - but if the choice came between Basey and Hartley then there wouldnt be much of a decision to make. Quote
Kowalski Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 We didnt add anymore strikers to the wage bill Incorrect. Doesn't matter, you are not grasping it. Or you're fishing. It's up to the manager what he does with the money allocated to him. If he doesn't sign any full backs then that's his decision. Quote
RDU_64 Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Maybe they should have signed 11 Grant Baseys then. What has that got to do with anything? Liverpool were joint bottom of the league for a while - does that make all their players shit? It's just indicative of the standard of Barnets players and that includes Grant Basey. No, Liverpool are in the Premiership. Barnet are in League Two. P.S - Liverpool were second bottom, not joint bottom. Quote
BigAl Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Incorrect. Doesn't matter, you are not grasping it. Or you're fishing. It's up to the manager what he does with the money allocated to him. If he doesn't sign any full backs then that's his decision. +1 Bang on Kow.....all from the same budget. Up to McGhee how he cut the cake. Quote
stoney Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Incorrect. Doesn't matter, you are not grasping it. Or you're fishing. It's up to the manager what he does with the money allocated to him. If he doesn't sign any full backs then that's his decision. Who did we take into the wage bill after hartley then? Lets move the goal posts again, if you were allowed to bring in One player Hartley or Basey who would you have picked? Quote
RDU_64 Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Who did we take into the wage bill after hartley then? Lets move the goal posts again, if you were allowed to bring in One player Hartley or Basey who would you have picked? Your the only one moving goalposts. McGhee knew his budget. He chose to spend it and not bring in any full-backs. Quote
stoney Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Your the only one moving goalposts. McGhee knew his budget. He chose to spend it and not bring in any full-backs. Well it was either Go the season without left backs or without a midfield, the budget he was given wasnt nearly enough to turn-around the depth of squad we have previously had. Quote
Kowalski Posted November 12, 2010 Report Posted November 12, 2010 Who did we take into the wage bill after hartley then? Lets move the goal posts again, if you were allowed to bring in One player Hartley or Basey who would you have picked? I wouldn't have waited until signing Hartley before looking at full backs, if that's what you are suggesting he did. It's his budget, up to him whether he signs strikers first then waits to see if he can afford a full back. Quote
️ COME ON YOU REDS! ️
️ COME ON YOU REDS! ️
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.