Dirthy Filthy Hun Scumbag Vermin (deceased) and Poundland tribute act

[fatjim]

salted popcorn is rank.

[mizer]

BBC guy saying it will be later on today if not tomorrow before they sack players

[BigAl]

An awful lot of people saying the huns could be liquidated in the next 24 hours.

 

 

Who needs online porn when you've got the prospect of this

[manc_don]

Who needs online porn when you've got the prospect of this

 

Would definitely be too good to be true!

 

Salted popcorn ftw.

[Penfold]

An awful lot of people saying the huns could be liquidated in the next 24 hours.

 

Wishful thinking I reckon.

 

Heard this (liquidated, not the 24 hour thing) on Tuesday.

 

This money in a solicitors account is apparently the last lifeline. They only think it's there because it is the account the Ticketus money went in to and only £18m of that was spent paying off Lloyds.

 

Chances are Whyte has had it moved somewhere in his web of companies ready for it to reappear in time to fund a NewCo Rangers.

[mizer]

Who needs online porn when you've got the prospect of this

 

Salted popcorn ftw.

 

:lolabove:

[BobbyBiscuit]

Heard this (liquidated, not the 24 hour thing) on Tuesday.

 

This money in a solicitors account is apparently the last lifeline. They only think it's there because it is the account the Ticketus money went in to and only £18m of that was spent paying off Lloyds.

 

Chances are Whyte has had it moved somewhere in his web of companies ready for it to reappear in time to fund a NewCo Rangers.

 

The claims are being backed up by the rumour/news/belief that the huns only have enough cash to get them to the end of March, if they're lucky.

 

[Tyrant]

salted popcorn is rank.

 

 

-1

[fatjim]

 

-1

 

-1

[Tyrant]

Touche.

[BigAl]

SSN reporting administrators state there will be no redundancies announced today.

Just need to hold the thought until tomorrow.

[Mentorred]

Meanwhile Dunermline cannot pay there players and are due money from Rangers.

If I am right in thinking when any other team went into administration they were laying off staff in the 1st week.

[Tyrant]

Heard this (liquidated, not the 24 hour thing) on Tuesday.

 

This money in a solicitors account is apparently the last lifeline. They only think it's there because it is the account the Ticketus money went in to and only £18m of that was spent paying off Lloyds.

 

Chances are Whyte has had it moved somewhere in his web of companies ready for it to reappear in time to fund a NewCo Rangers.

 

 

Fair play. The boy's an evil genius!

[baggy89]

Meanwhile Dunermline cannot pay there players and are due money from Rangers.

If I am right in thinking when any other team went into administration they were laying off staff in the 1st week.

 

Wonder if the Tims could give the money owed to Dunfermline directly out of the ticket money they're withholding from the Huns?

[glasgowdon]

Wonder if the Tims could give the money owed to Dunfermline directly out of the ticket money they're withholding from the Huns?

 

Why would they do that?

[topcorner]

Why would they do that?

 

If Bob owes Jim X money, and Hamish owes Bob Y money, then Hamish just owes Jim (X-Y) money.

 

[fatjim]

If Bob owes Jim X money, and Hamish owes Bob Y money, then Hamish just owes Jim (X-Y) money.

 

 

Hamish is a cunt.

[topcorner]

Hamish is a cunt.

 

So is Bob. I feel sorry for Jim.

[mizer]

Wonder if the Tims could give the money owed to Dunfermline directly out of the ticket money they're withholding from the Huns?

 

I was thinking this, but Im sure the administrators would not allow this. Plus Celtic are cunts.

[fatjim]

So is Bob. I feel sorry for Jim.

 

Bob & Jim are made up characters. So is Jimbob.

 

Virtual cunts so to speak.

[dandy]

Unless Y is greater than X!

[mizer]

Ticketus have urged a 'rapid and successful conclusion' to Rangers' administration process and are willing to hold talks with any potential new owners.

 

The firm paid £24million to secure the right to sell the club's future season tickets, with part of the cash used by owner Craig Whyte to complete his takeover of the Scottish champions last May.

 

Administrators Duff and Phelps confirmed money from the deal was used by Whyte to pay the club's £18million debt to Lloyds Banking Group when he purchased Sir David Murray's majority shareholding.

 

The revelation came several days after Rangers were forced to call in the administrators on February 14th over an unpaid tax bill of £9million accrued during Whyte's tenure.

 

Ticketus say they want to help Rangers find a successful solution to their financial problems and also want to ensure the ticket purchase agreement entered into with the club is honoured.

 

A statement on Thursday read: "Following a meeting yesterday with Rangers Football Club's administrators Duff & Phelps, Ticketus would like to state its desire for a rapid and successful conclusion to the club's administration process and confirm its willingness to enter into discussions with any serious potential bidders for the club.

 

"We met with the administrators yesterday to make it clear that we intend to be part of a solution for the club, and to ensure a fast and fair resolution is achieved for all parties.

Stability

 

"We outlined that this includes working with potential purchasers to help provide various financing solutions to the club that would be attractive to new owners.

 

"Ticketus believes that the best outcome for Rangers, its fans, Ticketus and our investors is for the administration process to be concluded as soon as possible, with a purchaser found who is able to bring stability to the club.

 

"Ticketus has an obligation to its investors to pursue all avenues to ensure that the ticket purchase agreement it entered into with the club is honoured, and we are committed to going to the lengths necessary to ensure that the future of the club is preserved and its agreement with Ticketus fulfilled.

 

"We believe that our investors' interests are aligned to those looking to safeguard the club's future.

 

"We have already been in contact with a number of other key stakeholders, including potential bidders and fans' representatives, and believe working collaboratively with all parties to create a solution for the club that puts it on a secure financial footing must be everyone's priority.

 

"Ticketus looks forward to continuing to work with the administrators and serious potential bidders to secure a positive outcome for the club."

 

So is going to take over a club were over 50% of the income for 4 years goes to ticketus?

[baggy89]

Why would they do that?

 

To noise up the Huns and because;

 

I was thinking this, but Im sure the administrators would not allow this. Plus Celtic are cunts.

[BobbyBiscuit]

you can almost see and feel the tears of the "journalist" in this piece:

 

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/2012/03/01/rangers-in-crisis-11-ibrox-players-set-to-be-axed-as-administrators-begin-savage-cuts-86908-23770531/

[BobbyBiscuit]

Taken from Mad:

 

I like the cut of this writer's jib. Not sure where it came from, but makes a lot of sense:

 

It wasn’t supposed to be this way. Craig Whyte would not have expected Champions League football when he worked on the deal to buy Rangers last spring, but, by his own admission, income from the Europa League group stage was in the budget.

 

Winning the league came as a surprise late in the process and may have fuelled some summer transfer bids but income was about to fall well below expectations. Ally McCoist won only one game in four cup competitions, against Arbroath, season ticket sales didn’t bounce and with no serious income streams open, Rangers were set for a seriously low income season.

 

In addition, the injury to Steven Naismith robbed Rangers of what I understand would have been a £5m sale in January.

 

People have tried to assert that Whyte’s plan for Rangers was to liquidate the company all along, this is clearly not the case. Rangers were moribund while the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) was yet to report but Whyte planned to run the company, without reverting to administration until and perhaps beyond then.

 

As well as having to deal with the income shocks resulting from multiple on-field failures, Rangers were hit with an expenditure shock. The FTT was delayed from November to January. If it had proceeded as planned in November it would have reported in January. The delay was crucial, Rangers were going to spend a lot more money before the verdict was announced.

 

If the verdict arrived as expected in January, and Rangers won, it was game on. They would have been in a position to borrow like any other club and could have raised fresh share capital. There would have been no administration. This was the preferred outcome, Whyte would have emerged with his reputation intact and with a valuable football franchise for the outlay of exactly £1.

 

If they lost, Whyte could have presented a fait-accompli to the world.

 

He could have explained to the Rangers support that the total tax liability was “likely to be around £75m” and that there was no point putting fresh investment into a black hole, which was inevitably going to lead to liquidation – all for misdemeanours that occurred before his time. The support would have been distressed at the death of their history, but, crucially, they would not have blamed Whyte, whose reputation would still be intact.

 

He would immediately have applied for the 10 day grace period to consider appointing an administrator and used that time to tell the SPL and SFA that he could re-emerge with Newco FC within days and allow the league programme to complete as normal. He had security over the stadium, would be in a position to re-employ the players and would be able to honour financial commitments to other clubs, while securing the television and sponsorship contracts.

 

Public sympathy would have been behind him, Sir David Murray would have carried the blame (perhaps correctly) and I believe only Celtic would have voted against him. Newco would have been back in the SPL and, if the Daily Record’s reporting of Whyte’s thoughts on penalties are anything to go by, he expected to be docked a comfortable 25 points.

 

HMRC forcing Rangers into administration this month created enormous problems. Administrators Duff and Phelps are now in control and opened the club’s finances up to scrutiny.

 

As soon as it became evident that he securitised season ticket money from future years, three days after buying the club, placing the money into his own bank account, not that of the football club, Craig Whyte’s methods were subject to derision and outright disgust from many angles, most importantly from the Rangers support.

 

As things stand, Whyte cannot slip away. He has to stand with Ticketus, who will hold a security on Ibrox through one of Whyte’s companies, and he stands to gain an enormous amount of money for a year’s hard work. Ticketus are also in for the long haul, they have coughed up over £20m and will need a sizeable commercial return.

 

Many observers have noted that this has not progressed as a normal administration. It’s not a normal administration. The secured creditors (Craig Whyte and Ticketus) need to sell a lot of tickets beyond administration, either as Rangers, if they are successful in the FTT, or as Newco, if they lose the FTT. Selling a lot of tickets is a really tough challenge right now and will be made considerably more difficult if there are swingeing cuts made to the club staff and infrastructure now. Their interests are considerably best served by keeping Rangers as buoyant as possible.

 

Even if they manage to feed enough cash to the administrators to keep Rangers playing football until the verdict is delivered, the opportunity to present the league with a fait-accompli has gone. Everyone expects Rangers to fold and will have been busy working on a contingency plan.

 

Any goodwill that Whyte hoped to harvest has also gone, he is seen as a pariah, without friends within the game, in the political world, the media or the Rangers support. When he looks to build a consensus, there will be no advocates for his position. Quite the opposite, people want rid of him.

 

The on-going police enquiry and his interesting relationships with the Insolvency Service and HMRC will only cloud matters further. For all the bluster on these subjects, no one has been able to explain to me any illegal activities, in fact, most of the illegal activity he has been accused of are either perfectly legal or simply did not take place as described, but there is enough potential in this mix for many years of civil legal challenge, if not more serious issues.

 

Whyte and Ticketus now have decisions to make on how much extra skin to invest. Ticketus are in the game for a lot of money already and will be keen to protect their cash. It remains to be seen how much cash Whyte has in the client account at Collyer Bristow, but it’s clear that between them, Ticketus and Whyte were prepared to guarantee the administrators full wages and costs for the club for February.

 

The fact that the tap has been turned on 100% for the last two weeks suggests they have enough cash to run at a lower percentage for a while yet. Duff and Phelps will know how much money is available and will have an expected date for the verdict. It would be enormously bad judgement if they exhausted cash reserves before the verdict arrived.

 

As long as Ticketus investors hold their nerve, and the police don’t spike the process, Rangers will survive until the verdict. If they lose the verdict, and all expectations are that they will, what are we looking at?

 

As I said above, Whyte’s chance of presenting a fait-accompli has gone. He would need to go for a prepack liquidation but there are likely to be legal challenges to him making off with the assets of Rangers. At best, this would delay him for anything between weeks and years. Any police involvement would make matters even more difficult. If a negative verdict is delivered anytime soon, Rangers will cease.

 

Even if this happens, Whyte will still owe Ticketus a lot of money and will try to phoenix as a Newco. He will have the stadium and will be in pole position to apply for membership to the SPL or Scottish Football League.

 

A route back into the SPL in these circumstances would be difficult to achieve. The SPL board have the authority to accept a club into the league but I hear it is likely that, due to the importance of the matter, they would refer the decision to a vote of the entire league. Back in October I thought the fait-accompli was certain to be voted into the SPL, now I can’t see a Newco being voted in.

 

You would expect an application into the Scottish Football League to be accepted but there may be a rival bid. The ‘Blue Knights’ bid would not include Ibrox but have a number of options. They could ask to rent Hampden or Firhill, or could adopt a struggling lower league club, like Clyde. These notions are likely to be progressed but establishing a new club, without players or a stadium, would be an enormous challenge.

 

All of this would play out against a great deal of uncertainty. Whyte’s ability to sell tickets to Rangers fans must be in doubt. If a rival club wanted back into Ibrox in the future they would need to give the ultimate floating charge holder – Ticketus – the same kind of return Whyte has committed to. There is also the possibility of a lot more to come out about the old regime at Rangers, some of whom are behind the Blue Knights bid.

 

Even if someone gets a phoenix off the ground at Ibrox, keeping it alive will be difficult. The cost of running football games there every second week is considerable. Doing so, while repaying Ticketus, and competing against lower league (or SPL) opposition, will cut any football budget to levels not known in 30 years.

 

For now, everyone connected with Rangers needs to make confident noises but even if they die, their ghost is already in enormous peril