Superstar Tradesman Posted June 20, 2014 Report Posted June 20, 2014 Anyone else find it strange that whilst the whole country was gripped in a recession and unemployment at an all time high, that Spanish teams and athletes were so dominant? For example Barca & Spain were picking up silverware and breaking records everywhere and Rafa was running the show in tennis (whilst making females weak at the knees with his impressive physique despite saying he rarely lifts weights). Then this happens...... http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/cycling/22361185 But no names come out, big cover-up, nothing to see here. Yet almost overnight Barca win fuck all, Spain are looking likely to be first on the plane home from Brazil and Rafa's perennially injured or crashing out of competitions at the first round despite being the world's numero uno. In fact, speaking of cover-ups, Rafa's decided to do just that, he's ditching the sleeveless tops in favour of sleeves which give him less freedom. Why would you want to restrict your movements on court, unless of course it was to hide what is no longer there? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1200180/Rafael-Nadal-talks-fashion-avoids-gym.html#ixzz0LhjxHgW6 Reeks of shite if you ask me. Quote
Kowalski Posted June 20, 2014 Report Posted June 20, 2014 There's definitely a story and there's plenty of rumours on the net about Nadal, all circumstantial but it reeks. Quote
Tyrant Posted June 20, 2014 Report Posted June 20, 2014 The Nadal rumours have been doing the rounds for years. I'd be surprised if it was true. Quote
Superstar Tradesman Posted June 20, 2014 Author Report Posted June 20, 2014 Messi's dip in form? Guardiola ditching an unstoppable team saying he's knackered, then relatively shortly afterwards picks up up the reigns at the biggest club in Germany? Quote
manc_don Posted June 20, 2014 Report Posted June 20, 2014 Interesting theory ST, apparently it is common knowledge re the Nadal rumours. Certainly does make you question their dominance though. Quote
Tyrant Posted June 23, 2014 Report Posted June 23, 2014 Tennis players are tested though. Not very regularly but still now and again. How would Rafa be getting away with it? I just can't see it tbh be honest. Quote
baggy89 Posted June 23, 2014 Report Posted June 23, 2014 Tennis players are tested though. Not very regularly but still now and again. How would Rafa be getting away with it? I just can't see it tbh be honest. How did Lance Armstrong get away with it for so long? Quote
Kowalski Posted June 23, 2014 Report Posted June 23, 2014 How did Lance Armstrong get away with it for so long? How good a tennis player was he? Quote
Tyrant Posted June 24, 2014 Report Posted June 24, 2014 How did Lance Armstrong get away with it for so long? Was that not during a period where cyclists just weren't tested? I'm nae sure but that's the impression I had? Or is it more that the means and ways of doping are so advanced that modern testing can't keep up? If they could bust Rafa at some point in the next week and a half that'd be great. Quote
Superstar Tradesman Posted June 24, 2014 Author Report Posted June 24, 2014 My (limited) understanding of it is that the clinic was a like a blood bank for the athletes. They would take blood from the athletes at some point, store it in bags and then inject it back into the athletes when they needed it. So they'd have more blood in their system when it came time to compete. More blood means more red blood cells, more red blood cells that carries oxygen round the body, means the body performs better. I'm not sure if they can test for that? Quote
Kowalski Posted June 24, 2014 Report Posted June 24, 2014 My (limited) understanding of it is that the clinic was a like a blood bank for the athletes. They would take blood from the athletes at some point, store it in bags and then inject it back into the athletes when they needed it. So they'd have more blood in their system when it came time to compete. More blood means more red blood cells, more red blood cells that carries oxygen round the body, means the body performs better. I'm not sure if they can test for that? I think that's pretty much it, a very sophisticated programme. But the authorities were also slack in pursuing Armstrong as they didn't want their sport tainted any further. At least one of the doctors involved in helping Armstrong was Spanish. Quote
Tyrant Posted June 24, 2014 Report Posted June 24, 2014 My (limited) understanding of it is that the clinic was a like a blood bank for the athletes. They would take blood from the athletes at some point, store it in bags and then inject it back into the athletes when they needed it. So they'd have more blood in their system when it came time to compete. More blood means more red blood cells, more red blood cells that carries oxygen round the body, means the body performs better. I'm not sure if they can test for that? So there's no use of banned substances? It might be immoral but is that illegal? Quote
Superstar Tradesman Posted June 25, 2014 Author Report Posted June 25, 2014 I think it would be naive to think that's all the doctor was doing with the blood, otherwise why would it be a big secret? I'm sure that press clipping said there were performance enhancing drugs lifted from his clinic at the same time they busted him. Quote
Kowalski Posted July 7, 2014 Report Posted July 7, 2014 Good documentary about Lance Armstrong on BBC4 last night, it is on the BBC iPlayer. Lance was up to his eyeballs. Channel 4 also showing a different documentary tonight. Quote
baggy89 Posted July 7, 2014 Report Posted July 7, 2014 So there's no use of banned substances? It might be immoral but is that illegal? It's called blood doping and has been illegal since 1986. Quote
baggy89 Posted July 7, 2014 Report Posted July 7, 2014 Was that not during a period where cyclists just weren't tested? I'm nae sure but that's the impression I had? Or is it more that the means and ways of doping are so advanced that modern testing can't keep up? If they could bust Rafa at some point in the next week and a half that'd be great. Off the top of my head David Millar, Maco Pantani, Jan Ulrich all tested postive during his 7 tour wins, but in an effort to provide more evidence I looked up doping cases in cycling. Seriously if you believe cyclists weren't tested, look it up. 10 - 20 a year were testing positive and/or being banned from '99 on (Armstrong's first win), including Armstrong himself in '99. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.